contribute to & the Colony
unable
percentage of the salaries? to cover the
contention".
I don't. Will this because the Treasury's idea of reasonable other
it has happened before him
What seem to me the strong principle
plan is to pay
These
penions
I'm thinking a provision in the
for Treasury to reply to It King
& Permanent Secretary to find, pension & the Assistant Bay all by thing
It? by that the U.S. gear, subject to the modification
copy
copy come Khar 12
Restrict
agree
25.5:16
Toy. The case looks bit be courses other Gibraltar case references
That consopee
we could look up
Catt
Address reply to - "The Secretary. General Post Office."
quoting Registered No
Sir,
253883/15.
GENERAL POST OFFICE, LONDON,
25th May 1916.
23638
REC REG 20 MAY 16
I am directed by the Postmaster General to refer to
your letter of the 28th of October, 1910, No. 32,262/1910,
concerning the transfer from Hong Kong to the Imperial Post
Office of financial responsibility for the British Post
Office Agencies in China from the 1st of January 1911.
I am to acquaint you, for the information of the
Secretary of State for the Colonies, that in view of the
uncertainty as to the future of the Agencies no steps have
been taken to transfer any of the staff employed at the Agencies to the establishment of the Imperial Civil Service by granting them Civil Service Certificates although some of the staff were regarded as established officers of the Hong
Kong Civil Service.
It is nevertheless recognised that those members who were entitled to pensions or gratuities under their conditions of service with the Hong Kong Government have a title to some pension or gratuities in respect of their service since the 1st of January 1911.
In view of the objections which still obtain to their formal transfer to the Imperial Service and of the difficulties involved in the application of the Superannuation Acts to the staff, it has been suggested by the Lords
Commissioners
Under Secretary of State,
COLONIAL OFFICE.
"contubule & the Colony
umable
percentage of the salaries? &cover the
corto sension".
I don't Will this because the Tumsay's idea of reasonable othe
L
it has happened before him
my
What seem to me the stron romiple
plan is to thong #pay
A
These
pennois
L
I'm thing scall a provides in th
for Tuasury to reply to It King
tu
& Pereme wahrten to fad, pension & the Ansant Bay all by thing
بوور
It? by that the 1. S. gear, subject & the modification
sand
coff 57y 27
copy
ropy come Khor 12
Resssfu
4
agree
Are
25.5:16
Toy. The case locks bit be courses ofther Sibraltar cass rifnecesary
That consopee
we couldlosk op
Catt
at me
24kg 16
Address reply to -"The Secretary. General Post Office."
quoting Registered No
Sir,
253883/15.
204
GENERAL POST OFFICE. LONDON,
May 1916.,
C
23638
REC REG 20 MAY 16
I am directed by the Postmaster General to refer to
Fen your letter of the 28th of October, 1910, No. 32,262/1910,
concerning the transfer from Hong Kong to the Imperial Post
Office of financial responsibility for the British Post
Office Agencies in China from the 1st of January 1911.
I am to acquaint you, for the information of the
Secretary of State for the Colonies, that in view of the
uncertainty as to the future of the Agencies no steps have
been taken to transfer any of the staff employed at the Agencies to the establishment of the Imperial Civil Service by granting them Civil Service Certificates although some of the staff were regarded as established officers of the Hong
Kong Civil Service.
It is nevertheless recognised that those members who were entitled to pensions or gratuities under their conditions of service with the Hong Kong Government have a title to some pension or gratuities in respect of their service since the 1st of January 1911.
In view of the objections which still obtain to their formal transfer to the Imperial Service and of the difficulties involved in the application of the Superannuation Acts to the staff, it has been suggested by the Lords
Commissioners
Under Secretary of State,
COLONIAL OFFICE.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.